Constitutional Law Professors React to Major Issues Raised in 2nd Presidential Debate

schindler

Devin Schindler

Following the Oct. 9 presidential debate between candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, Western Michigan University-Cooley Law School constitutional experts at the law school's Michigan and Tampa Bay campuses took a deeper look into two constitutional topics that were discussed: Trump's claim of appointing a special prosecutor to look into Clinton's alleged email scandal, and how each candidate would handle appointing justices to the Supreme Court.

Regarding the idea that Trump would appoint a special prosecutor to investigate any criminal wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton because of her use of a private email server, Professor Devin Schindler looked to the independence of the attorney general (A.G.) while professors Brendan Beery and Jeff Swartz looked at laws regarding the appointment of special prosecutors.

"This claim is questionable since the Independent Counsel Law is designed to remove the president and his or her political motives from the criminal investigatory process," said Beery, who teaches Constitutional Law at the Tampa Bay campus. "It is also inconsistent with longstanding rules and protocols against political meddling in the business of the Justice Department."

Swartz, a former Miami-Dade County judge noted that, "Under the present Special Prosecutor statute, the president would not have such powers, unless the U.S. Attorney General or the investigating U.S. Attorney had a conflict of interest."

Swartz

Jeffrey Swartz

"Historically, the U.S. Attorney General has been viewed as being above politics, however, the A.G. is a member of the executive branch who answers to the president," said Schindler, who teaches Constitutional Law at WMU-Cooley's Michigan campuses.

In addition to Trump's special prosecutor claim, the candidates discussed the kinds of justices they would consider appointing to the Supreme Court.

"The philosophical difference as to how the Constitution should be interpreted dates back to the adoption of the Constitution itself. The candidates have very different views as the appropriate role of the Supreme Court," said Schindler. "Trump has announced he would nominate candidates who reflect an originalist perspective, meaning judges who espouse this theory look to the plain language of the Constitution and to the historic milieu that was adopted. Clinton has indicated she will nominate judges who reflect a non-originalist perspective."

Swartz agrees with Schindler that the differences between the two candidates on the Supreme Court could not be any further apart.

beery

Brendan Beery

"Trump's approach is to place on the court conservative justices who would roll back regulations, institute substantial changes in the application of the fourth, fifth and sixth  amendments, and overturn Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to chose," said Swartz. "Clinton would place upon the court progressive justices who see the Constitution as a living and breathing document, which must apply itself to society as it changes.  Those justices would be more apt to apply the 14th Amendment to expand protections to minority groups and preserve a woman's right to chose.  When given the right opportunity, a court dominated by progressives would uphold any campaign finance laws which Congress would create, uphold the Affordable Care Act and any new regulations placed on those who operate within our financial institutions."

 


About Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School: Western Michigan University and Thomas M. Cooley Law School affiliated in 2014, combining the status of a nationally-ranked, public, comprehensive research university with the commitment to practical legal education of an independent, non-profit, national law school. WMU-Cooley is accredited by both the American Bar Association and the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association. The law school has provided nearly 20,000 graduates with the practical skills necessary for a seamless transition from academia to the real world, and enrolls classes in January, May, and September at its Lansing, Auburn Hills, and Grand Rapids, Michigan campuses, and its Tampa Bay, Florida campus. WMU and the law school continue to operate as independent institutions with their own governance structure and separate fiduciary responsibilities.

 

Highlights

Legal scholars discuss Trump's special prosecutor claims

Differences in Supreme Court nomination process examined


News »

News & Media Contacts

Karen Hogan, SeyferthPR
hogan@seyferthpr.com
P: 1-800-435-9539

Terry Carella, Director of Communications
carellat@cooley.edu
P: (517) 371-5140, ext. 2916

Cooley @ Social

WMU Cooley Facebook WMU Cooley Twitter WMU Cooley YouTube WMU Cooley Instagram WMU Cooley LinkedIn WMU Cooley Wordpress Blog Google+ WMU Cooley  wmucooley_lawschoolinsider_blog_rss_feed WMU Cooley Mobile

An independent, private, non-profit educational institution affiliated with Western Michigan University. The Law School, as an independent institution, is solely responsible for its academic program. Accredited by the American Bar Association and the Higher Learning Commission. The Law School has campuses across Michigan in Lansing, Auburn Hills, Grand Rapids and in Tampa Bay, Florida.

Admissions | Non-Discrimination Policy | Public Information | Mobile

© Western Michigan University Cooley Law School 2015

Western Michigan University Cooley Law School
In corde hominem est anima legis.

WMU Cooley Law Designated 2016 Military Friendly® School